Introduction

The “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation, launched by the Palestinian resistance in the Gaza Strip against the Israeli occupation in the early hours of Saturday, October 7, 2023, marked a significant turning point in the Palestinian struggle for freedom. This operation, which involved ground, naval, and aerial attacks, as well as infiltrations by resistance fighters into several settlements around Gaza, was announced by Muhammad Deif, the Chief of Staff of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas). It was considered the largest operation on Israel in decades.

Palestinian fighters infiltrated the settlements around Gaza through the border fence, supported by naval commandos and paratroopers from the al-Qassam Brigades. In a pre-recorded audio message, Deif declared, “We announce the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Flood operation with an initial strike targeting enemy military sites, airports, and fortifications.” He highlighted the operation’s magnitude, stating that over 5,000 rockets and shells were launched within the first 20 minutes.

Deif characterized October 7 as “the day of the great battle to end the last occupation on Earth,” calling on Palestinian people in the West Bank and within 1948 territories to join the fight using all available means, including firearms, bladed weapons, and through protests and sit-ins. He also urged Arab and Muslim populations to support the Palestinian cause through demonstrations and other forms of grassroots pressure.

The name “Al-Aqsa Flood” holds deep significance as it signifies a response to ongoing Israeli violations of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and other Islamic holy sites in occupied Al-Quds. In the initial hours of the operation, hundreds of Israeli soldiers and settlers were reported killed, with over 100 captured or missing. The operation resulted in the closure of local airports in central and southern Israel and the cancellation of numerous flights to Ben Gurion Airport.

October 7 has become a pivotal moment in Palestinian history, emphasizing that despite military and economic isolation, Palestinian people refuse to surrender. It challenges the global community to recognize the Palestinian issue as rooted in a deeper historical and political reality—the right to resist colonial oppression.

The one-year anniversary of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation serves as more than just a remembrance; it is an opportunity to reflect on the ongoing struggle, the sacrifices made, and the resilience that has sustained the Palestinian cause for over 75 years. This commemoration honors those who lost their lives and acknowledges the persistent suffering and defiance of a people enduring occupation, dispossession, and violence for generations.

On October 7, 2023, Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), launched the operation known as “Al-Aqsa Flood.” This operation marked a watershed moment in the ongoing struggle for liberation. The operation unfolded with a level of audacity and planning, demonstrating the determination of the Palestinian people to reclaim their rights and confront decades of occupation. Major moments from the operation include:

Border Breaches: One of the most defining moments of that day was the breaching of the heavily fortified barriers surrounding Gaza. Palestinian fighters, demonstrating remarkable courage and resilience, penetrated defenses that had long been perceived as impenetrable. Qassam fighters successfully killed and captured Israeli settlers, inflicting significant casualties and wounding many more.

Military Confrontations: In the hours that followed the initial incursions, intense confrontations erupted across various Israeli settlements and military installations. Palestinian fighters engaged Israeli occupation forces in direct combat, capturing military posts and asserting control over key areas.

Mass Mobilization: As the operation unfolded, the streets of Gaza transformed into scenes of solidarity and unity. Civilians, aware of the risks involved, stood shoulder to shoulder with the fighters, displaying unwavering support for the resistance. The broader Palestinian population recognized this moment as an unprecedented opportunity to challenge the occupation on a scale not seen in years. Demonstrations erupted, and the collective spirit of defiance permeated every corner of Gaza.

The response from Israel unfolded with devastating consequences. In a bid to reassert control, Israel launched massive airstrikes that destroyed entire neighbourhoods. This wave of aggression was not merely a military reaction but an embodiment of a genocidal war, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. The toll included countless individuals killed, missing, and wounded, contributing to a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented scale.

Why Al-Aqsa Flood?

Hamas Movement clarified in the document titled “This is Our Narrative… Why Al-Aqsa Flood” that the Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood represents the Palestinian struggle against occupation and colonialism, a fight rooted in a long history of oppression. This struggle began long before October 7, 2023, with over a century of suffering, including 30 years of British colonial rule and 75 years of Zionist occupation.

In 1918, Palestinians owned 98.5% of the land and made up 92% of the population, a stark contrast to the Jewish immigrants arriving during early settlement migrations. Despite the British colonial regime facilitating Jewish immigration, by 1948, Zionists controlled only 6% of the land and accounted for 31.7% of the population. This imbalance led to widespread ethnic cleansing and massacres by Zionist gangs, resulting in the expulsion of over 57% of Palestinians and the destruction of more than 500 villages, paving the way for the establishment of the Zionist state.

The 1967 occupation of the remaining Palestinian territories further deepened the plight of the people. For over 17 years, the Gaza Strip has endured a suffocating siege, effectively transforming it into the world’s largest open-air prison. Throughout the decades, Palestinian people have faced relentless oppression, including apartheid policies, systemic violence, and military aggression, with Gaza experiencing five devastating aggressions initiated by the Israeli occupation. Peaceful protests, such as the “March of Return,” resulted in the deaths of over 360 Palestinian people and injuries to more than 19,000 others, including around 5,000 children.

Statistical studies reveal that from 2000 to September 2023, Israeli occupation forces killed 11,299 Palestinian people and injured 156,768, predominantly civilians. Unfortunately, the United States and its allies have largely ignored Palestinian suffering, focusing instead on Israeli casualties following the events of October 7, 2023. The U.S. continued to provide material support and cover for the Israeli government’s brutal actions against civilians in Gaza, actions that are condemned worldwide.

Numerous human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have documented Israeli violations, yet accountability remains elusive. The U.S. has historically treated Israel as a “state above the law,” enabling continued occupation and violence against the Palestinian people. Despite over 900 U.N. resolutions favoring Palestinian people over the past 75 years, Israel has defied them, with U.S. vetoes preventing any meaningful accountability.

Even peace processes, such as the Oslo Accords, have failed to establish a Palestinian state, as Israel has systematically destroyed any prospects for sovereignty through rampant settlement expansion. As recently as September 2023, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu displayed a map encompassing all historical Palestine, reflecting Israel’s refusal to recognize Palestinian rights. Given this context of ongoing suffering and oppression, the world must reconsider its expectations of the Palestinian people.

In the face of ongoing threats to Al-Aqsa Mosque, increased settler violence, and the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the question arises: what options are left for Palestinians? After 75 years of occupation, suffering, and failed peace processes, was it reasonable for the world to expect the Palestinians to continue waiting for solutions from international institutions that have proven ineffective? Thus, the Al-Aqsa Flood operation on October 7, 2023, was a necessary response to Israeli occupation plans aimed at erasing the Palestinian cause, seizing land, and further entrenching occupation. It symbolizes the Palestinian people’s resolve to reclaim their rights and aspirations for freedom and independence, as is the right of any oppressed population.

The document further clarifies that Hamas’s objectives in the Al-Aqsa Flood operation were specific: it targeted Israeli occupation military sites and aimed to capture enemy soldiers in order to negotiate the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners. This focus on military targets was a response to the constant attacks and violence inflicted on Gaza. Hamas emphasizes its commitment to avoiding civilian casualties, underscoring that any unintended harm is a regrettable consequence of defending against a powerful and violent occupation.

Historically, Hamas has upheld principles aimed at safeguarding civilian lives, yet the chaotic circumstances of the conflict sometimes lead to unintended outcomes. The organization has actively sought to secure the release of civilian hostages while addressing the long-standing injustices faced by Palestinians in Israeli prisons. Allegations regarding the targeting of civilians by Hamas are unfounded and stem from a distorted narrative that seeks to justify Israeli aggression.

Evidence from that day indicates that many civilian casualties among Israelis resulted from confusion and misfires by Israeli police and military forces. Assertions of specific atrocities, such as the killing of infants or acts of sexual violence against Israeli women, have been disproven by independent investigations. This narrative, propagated largely through Israeli media, has been effectively countered by emerging evidence, further discrediting the justifications for the violence inflicted upon Gaza.

Palestinian Cause Resurgent

The “Al-Aqsa Flood” has brought the Palestinian cause back to the forefront, exposing a truth that the American and Western media have covered up for over seventy years. This truth is that Palestine is the issue of a people whose rights have been usurped, and they will continue to demand these rights, no matter the setbacks and coercions. The racist brutality of Zionism and the United States, along with the destruction, starvation, and genocide they have inflicted, combined with the steadfastness of the citizens of Gaza, has begun to shift the narrative in favor of the resistance.

The remaining conscience among the new generations in the West has started to awaken to the nature and history of the conflict, as the name Palestine had been erased from their memory. Israel has long portrayed Hamas Movement, for the sake of obfuscation, as part of the “axis of evil,” labelling it as a terrorist organization. Throughout this time, the resistance has stood firm against the mightiest and most powerful state (the U.S.) and its regional arm, Israel. The events of October 7 stirred the status quo in the regional conflict, creating repercussions on multiple levels. It revealed that Zionism without America cannot endure for long against a people with a just cause.

The emergence of the changes we have witnessed on the international stage and in global arenas was unimaginable; who among us could have predicted that the peoples of the West—Germany, England, and all of Europe, as well as the United States—would rise up against their governments? These governments have supported this illegitimate entity, while the people have taken a courageous stand against the brutality of the Zionist enemy and their systems that collude in sin and aggression, urging them to refrain from endorsing the oppression, horrific killings, comprehensive destruction, and genocide.

We have seen Western media figures, celebrities from art, literature, and sports, as well as former politicians and diplomats, including some from Israel itself, criticize the actions of the war council and even Netanyahu. This has widened the gap between the war council and the people regarding their government. These global figures, standing with a just cause against the barbarism and savagery of this entity, have significantly contributed to fueling these international changes and the popular uprising in the streets of Europe and America.

Palestinian solidarity movements across the world were invigorated by Al-Aqsa Flood. Protests in capitals from New York to Kuala Lumpur demanded an end to the occupation and the siege. Advocacy for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement grew stronger, with increased calls for international institutions and corporations to divest from Israeli companies complicit in the occupation. The operation fuelled a sense of urgency among Palestinian supporters, as they recognized the importance of amplifying the voices of those living under occupation.

In contrast, Israel intensified its diplomatic lobbying efforts, particularly in Western capitals, framing the operation as an existential threat and positioning its military response as a legitimate defense. This narrative found traction in mainstream political spheres, but the grassroots movements, especially in the Global South, resonated more strongly with Palestinian voices, drawing parallels between Palestine’s struggle and anti-colonial movements worldwide.

The operation also brought into sharp focus the critical role that media and propaganda play in shaping global perceptions of the struggle. For years, the Palestinian people have struggled to tell their own stories in the face of an overwhelming Israeli propaganda machine that portrayed the resistance as terrorism and justified its military operations as acts of self-defence. Mainstream Western media outlets, heavily influenced by Israeli and pro-Israel narratives, often framed the operation through this lens, minimizing or entirely ignoring the context of occupation.

However, Al-Aqsa Flood also highlighted the growing power of Palestinian voices in countering these narratives, particularly through social media platforms. Young Palestinians, activists, and journalists used Twitter, Instagram, and other platforms to share their realities, posting firsthand accounts of life under siege, the destruction of their homes, and the loss of loved ones. These raw, unfiltered stories reached global audiences and created a groundswell of support that mainstream media could not easily ignore.

Yet, the challenges remained formidable. The occupation’s sophisticated media apparatus worked tirelessly to discredit Palestinian testimonies, painting any resistance as terrorism and using the operation to justify further crackdowns on Palestinian civil society. Social media companies often censored Palestinian content, either under pressure from Israeli lobbies or through algorithms that flagged pro-Palestinian posts as incitement or violence. Despite this, the resilience of Palestinian storytellers persisted, and their efforts to share the truth became an essential part of the broader resistance movement.

Al-Aqsa Flood also deepened the connections between Palestine and other global struggles for justice. Movements for Indigenous rights, anti-racism campaigns, and anti-colonial efforts in various parts of the world increasingly saw Palestine as a mirror of their own struggles. In many places, the Palestinian cause became a symbol of the broader fight against imperialism and state-sanctioned violence.

The parallels between apartheid South Africa and Israel’s occupation became more pronounced in international discourse, and solidarity with Palestine became a litmus test for global justice movements. The operation thus served as a catalyst for unifying different strands of global resistance, from Black Lives Matter in the United States to Indigenous movements in Latin America. For many of these groups, supporting Palestine was not just an act of solidarity, but a recognition of the interconnectedness of struggles against oppression and colonization.

The Human Cost and Struggles

The Al-Aqsa Flood operation, while a significant act of resistance, came at a heavy cost to the Palestinian people. The Israeli response was swift and brutal, aimed at breaking the spirit of Gaza’s defiance. Airstrikes levelled entire neighbourhoods, hospitals overflowed with casualties, and tens of thousands were displaced in a matter of days. For Palestinian people, this was not new. They had lived through such destruction many times before. The ongoing Zionist onslaught on all Palestine continues to bring devastation and suffering to the Palestinian people. The genocidal campaign targets civilians, particularly vulnerable groups such as children, women, and the elderly, causing irreparable loss and damage.

The death toll of Palestinian people has exceeded 41,638, with 75% of the casualties being children, women, and elderly people. Over 16,891 children and 11,458 women have been killed. Tragically, more than 10,000 Palestinian people remain trapped under the rubble of homes destroyed by Israeli occupation airstrikes, including 5,000 children. The number of injured has surpassed 96,460, with the majority being women and children. More than 3,652 massacres have been recorded, where entire families were killed in their homes during indiscriminate bombings. Over 17,000 children in Gaza have been orphaned.

In addition, 36 children in Gaza have died due to malnutrition and dehydration as famine spreads across the Strip. Since October 7, at least 54 Palestinian detainees have died in Israeli occupation prisons due to systematic torture and deliberate medical negligence. The material losses from the Israeli occupation aggression have surpassed $33 billion. Mass graves have been discovered across Gaza, with seven found in hospitals containing over 520 martyrs, most of them women and children. Among the victims are 471 Palestinian people killed in the bombing of Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital on October 17, along with civil defense teams, medical staff, and UNRWA workers targeted by the occupation forces.

The Israeli occupation army has forcibly disappeared over 5,000 Palestinian people from Gaza, detaining them in unknown locations. Many testimonies from released detainees have revealed that Palestinian people held in Israeli occupation jails endure all forms of torture, as well as deprivation of food and medical care.

The health sector in Gaza is under siege. Over 986 medical staff have been killed, and 717 others injured. More than 310 medical professionals, including hospital directors, were kidnapped while on duty. Thirty-four hospitals are completely out of service due to bombings and fuel shortages, while 80 healthcare centers have stopped providing services. 162 health facilities have been damaged, and 246 ambulances have been destroyed or severely damaged.

More than 25,000 injured Palestinian people are in urgent need of medical treatment abroad, but the ongoing blockade prevents their evacuation. Additionally, 3,500 children are at risk of death due to malnutrition. Hospitals are operating at 340% capacity, with severe shortages in medicines and medical supplies. Over 4,800 patients need daily care, and over 1,000 require urgent dialysis.

The Health Ministry reported that since March, 30 children have died due to malnutrition and dehydration, a direct result of Israel’s deliberate policy of starvation. Over 150,000 pregnant women are unable to access proper healthcare, while the treatment of 10,000 cancer patients has been disrupted. More than 350,000 patients with chronic illnesses are in need of medication that is no longer available. The spread of infectious diseases, including diarrhea and Hepatitis C, has affected over 1.7 million Palestinians due to unsanitary living conditions caused by the occupation’s relentless bombings.

More than 516,500 homes have been severely damaged, and 171,500 destroyed completely by Israeli bombs. Over 75% of all homes in Gaza have sustained damage. As a result, more than 2 million Palestinians are now displaced, with over one million living in overcrowded shelters in UNRWA schools.

The occupation has systematically targeted journalists and media offices in Gaza. So far, 174 journalists have been killed, 396 others have been critically injured, and at least two have been detained. More than 182 media offices have been damaged by the Israeli forces.

Israel has targeted Gaza’s vital infrastructure, with 489 schools and universities damaged, 123 of them completely destroyed. More than 201 government buildings and public facilities have been bombed. The occupation forces have destroyed 611 mosques and severely damaged 825 others, while three churches have also been hit. UNRWA facilities, industrial establishments, and agricultural lands have been obliterated, worsening the humanitarian disaster. The Israeli army has dropped over 85,000 tons of explosives, equivalent to more than twice the force of the atomic bomb used in Hiroshima.

The people of Gaza face famine, with over 600,000 people in the northern areas of the Strip under a complete siege, lacking access to food, water, and fuel. The humanitarian situation is dire, with people, especially children, living in constant fear and insecurity as bombs continue to fall.

The human cost of the Israeli genocidal war is not just measured in death tolls or destroyed buildings, but in the lives it has irrevocably changed. Each name lost in the bombardments tells a story of a life lived under occupation, a life full of dreams, hopes, and aspirations. These are not just numbers—they are fathers who once held their children, mothers who cooked for their families, and children who played in the streets of Gaza.

In marking the one-year anniversary of Al-Aqsa Flood, Palestinian people remember these lives as symbols of the ongoing struggle for freedom. Each displaced family, each life lost, each child orphaned is a testament to the fragility of existence under occupation.

The Israeli occupation launched its intensive and concentrated military campaign in the northern West Bank on August 28, targeting specifically the cities of Tubas, Tulkarem, Jenin, and refugee camps such as Nur Shams, Jenin, and al-Faraa. What is happening is merely another chapter in a series of military campaigns that have not ceased for years. Although these campaigns temporarily weakened the Palestinian resistance, it quickly re-emerged, stronger and more widespread, especially among Palestinian youth.

Arrests, raids, and killings in the West Bank did not stop before October 7, but they intensified after the “Al-Aqsa Flood” battle, leading to the martyrdom of more than 720 Palestinian people, approximately 5,750 injuries, and over 11,927 arrests within a year. During this time, there were also 2,331 assaults by Israeli settlers across the occupied West Bank, with the Israeli occupation army storming into 4,682 Palestinian homes and carrying out 12,671 incursions into various areas across the occupied West Bank.

Despite the intensity of Israeli security aggressions, the Palestinian resistance has managed to grow both in quantity and quality, spreading within the West Bank in a manner that alarms the occupation. The West Bank is considered a vulnerable flank in the occupation’s security and has historically been a source of resistance operations in the heart of occupied cities, which had ceased for years but have now resumed amidst the ongoing crimes of the Zionist entity against the Palestinian people.

The expansion of Palestinian resistance poses a challenge to the Israeli settlement project, which is supported by the Zionist government led by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu. It is noteworthy that the Israeli government aims to increase the number of settlers in the West Bank from 800,000 to 2 million in the coming years, with the goal of ending the idea of a Palestinian state, Judaizing Al-Quds and the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and annexing the West Bank under Israeli sovereignty through a de facto policy. On August 31, Finance Minister Smotrich stated, “We are working on the ground to strengthen settlement and thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state,” referring to the military campaign in the West Bank. Ben Gvir also announced his intention to build a Jewish synagogue inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The Legitimacy of Resistance

For years, the Israeli occupation in collusion with global Zionist forces and their allies in the United States, has attempted to equate “resistance” with “terrorism” in international law. Additionally, it has intensified the use of anti-Semitism laws against the Palestinian struggle for resisting occupation and building their independent state, even though these laws primarily address a European phenomenon for which Palestinian people bear no responsibility, yet have become its victims. Restoring the recognition of “resistance,” glorifying its legitimacy, and celebrating it globally are among the most significant achievements of the Palestinian people’s steadfastness in shaping global public opinion.

The world now understands that wherever there is occupation, there is resistance, and there is no room for confusion between resistance and terrorism. Resistance is a legitimate right to confront aggression, achieve sovereignty, and secure freedom of will. Politically, the resistance has succeeded, and its successes are reflected globally in decisions that will forever remain a stain on Israel and its leadership.

The resistance has succeeded in restoring the Palestinian cause to its true essence without distortion, turning it into a global issue rather than just a Palestinian one. It has also redefined the core goals of the Palestinian struggle, placing the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign state at the forefront of its objectives. This is where the political success of the resistance is realized.

Militarily, its success lies in its ability to endure, without supplies and under siege, against one of the most brutal war machines in the world. Israel has neither managed to defeat the resistance nor succeeded in retrieving its captives or eliminating the great influence of Hamas Movement in Gaza. In fact, the occupation’s actions have inadvertently strengthened the resistance’s leadership in Nablus, Jenin, Tulkarem, and other cities in the occupied West Bank, where the Israeli occupation army attempts to violate Palestinian dignity almost daily. The ultimate goal of the Palestinian resistance is to end the occupation and pave the way for an internationally guaranteed political process with a defined timeline to establish a viable, independent, and sovereign Palestinian state.

The resistance has gained broader international recognition of Palestine as a state, while Israel has lost support, with countries like South Africa standing against it in international forums and others, such as Brazil, withdrawing their ambassadors. Even nations previously considered allies of Israel, like Canada and the Netherlands, have imposed sanctions, including halting arms exports to Israel. The second domain for assessing the effectiveness of the resistance relates to the losses inflicted on the enemy. In the case of the Palestinian resistance, the focus is not on inflicting absolute damage, but on harming the enemy in ways that strengthen the identity, goals, and interests of the people it represents—whether in the diplomatic, economic, military, legal, or political arenas.

The primary strategic defeat inflicted by the Palestinian resistance on the Israeli occupation is the “collapse of Israel’s deterrence strategy.” This strategy once granted them the freedom to act unilaterally against Palestinian people and other regional populations without accounting for anything beyond their interests, as perceived by its government, while imposing heavy restrictions on any potential response from the aggressed party. This deterrence strategy was shattered in the resistance’s first strike, and the subsequent strategic losses inflicted on Israel by the resistance have transformed it into a pariah state on the global stage.

It is unprecedented in the history of the Zionist entity for it to fight continuously for an entire year. Likewise, never in the history of the world has a people endured a siege by land, sea, and air, faced with the latest weapons and the most barbaric, brutal tactics, and yet continued to stand firm as the Palestinian people have. When the occupation initiated its savage aggression, it did not anticipate that the war would last for months, but it now seems likely that it will extend beyond this year.

In the Gaza war, the occupation’s shells, artillery, tanks, and aircraft do not distinguish between soldiers and civilians; the Palestinian people as a whole are the target of this genocidal war. Israel sees its continued existence only through the annihilation of the Palestinian people. From the perspective of the occupying enemy, this war is not one of victory or defeat—it is a war of survival or annihilation. Yet, no matter how much the occupiers relies on brutal force, it will never defeat a people whose will to survive grows stronger, determined to live freely and independently in a sovereign state that matches their generations of sacrifices.

The Palestinian resistance has achieved an unprecedented global political victory, one that no one expected. It has shaken off the dust that had almost obscured the political nature of the Palestinian cause, which risked being reduced to merely a humanitarian issue. It has breathed new political life into the cause, putting an end to futile attempts over the past decades to offer piecemeal solutions through insignificant financial and social aid schemes, benefiting only opportunists and giving Israel security, settlement expansion, and regional control.

But this was not the resistance’s only success. It has succeeded in making the establishment of an independent Palestinian state the number one issue on the global agenda, the number one topic in world public opinion, and the number one issue on the agendas of the UN Security Council, the UN General Assembly, the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court.

An Exemplary Model of Wise Leadership

One of the most significant civilizational gains from the Al-Aqsa Flood battle is that it has highlighted for us—showcasing what already existed rather than creating it—a commendable model of conscious, diligent, and wise political leadership, represented by the leadership of Hamas and its political bureau both domestically and abroad. This leadership has neither tasted comfort nor found sleep since the beginning of the battle; they have been in continuous communication and follow-up, making efforts to stop the war and the bloodshed, manoeuvring with enemies and intermediaries, and engaging in international and regional communications with influential parties to fulfil their role.

This wise leadership has, through its awareness and intelligence, placed Netanyahu and his war council in a corner far removed from popular and global support. They put the ball in his court when they accepted the offer from mediators in Egypt and Qatar to halt the war, putting Netanyahu and his council in a losing position—either by accepting, which would bring the war into Israeli society by holding this council accountable for its failure, or by refusing, which would put the leadership of the entity in a state of international condemnation, both popular and official, and portray this entity as brutal and rejecting peace and an end to the war!

Furthermore, this leadership made the mediators understand Hamas’s position regarding the battle, which was reflected in the Americans themselves. The leadership—through its intelligence—created a significant gap and rift between Netanyahu and his war council, and between the Israeli people and their government. They have been keen to widen and amplify this gap through “political tactics” and “negotiation manoeuvres,” as well as through what the “military media” does in its impressive media, which incites the anger of the Israeli people against their leadership. This has led to the enemy losing its composure, following a blind personal agenda that cares only for destruction and ruin, and continuing to fail in the eyes of their own people and the world.

On the other hand, what indicates the wisdom of this leadership is that they blended battlefield toughness with legitimate jihad, along with political flexibility to the greatest extent possible while adhering to the established constants of the cause and the just demands of the battle. This has allowed the movement to gain its popular base through its actions and choices, and to highlight its pure image in the resistance to stop the aggression.

The Path to Justice

As we reflect on the year since the Al-Aqsa Flood operation, we see both progress and continuity in the struggle for Palestinian freedom. Some things have changed dramatically, while others remain painfully the same. Al-Aqsa Flood broke through years of international apathy and rekindled a global conversation on the Palestinian cause, drawing attention to the unrelenting siege, military occupation, violations of holy sites, places of worship, and mosques, and the denial of basic human rights to the Palestinian people. Yet, despite the increased awareness, the occupation remains entrenched, and the violence against Palestinian people persists. The path to justice remains fraught with challenges, but it is a journey the Palestinian people are determined to continue.

One of the most significant changes in the year following Al-Aqsa Flood has been the shift in global perception. The operation served as a wake-up call for many who had grown indifferent to the Palestinian plight. International media, human rights organizations, and civil society began paying closer attention to the injustices faced by Palestinian people under occupation. The intense military response by the occupation and the continued destruction of Gaza put a spotlight on the human cost of the siege, prompting renewed calls for international accountability.

At the grassroots level, the operation invigorated Palestinian solidarity movements worldwide. From the streets of Europe and North America to the capitals of the Global South, protests erupted in support of Palestine, drawing attention to the occupation’s brutality and demanding an end to the blockade. The operation underscored the urgency of Palestinian self-determination, mobilizing a new generation of activists and advocates to join the struggle.

Moreover, within Palestinian society, the operation reinforced the deep-rooted spirit of resistance. Despite the heavy toll it took on Palestinian lives, homes, and infrastructure, it also strengthened the collective resolve to resist. The notion that the Palestinian people would not accept the status quo of occupation and siege was once again proven, as they continued to assert their right to freedom, dignity, and justice.

Yet, despite these shifts, many of the underlying issues that sparked Al-Aqsa Flood remain unchanged. All of Palestine remains under brutal occupation, with Palestinian people facing severe shortages of food, medicine, clean water, and electricity, the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, home demolitions, and systematic violence, whether through military raids, arbitrary arrests, settler attacks, or assaults on holy sites and places of worship.

Internationally, while the conversation has shifted, tangible actions from powerful states and institutions have been slow to follow. Diplomatic pressure has increased in some circles, but many governments remain complicit in supporting the occupation, either directly or indirectly. The fight for Palestinian justice continues to be hampered by geopolitical interests that prioritize strategic alliances over human rights.

Despite these persistent challenges, the hope for freedom and justice remains alive. Palestinian people have never wavered in their belief that their struggle is one of liberation and human dignity. The future, though uncertain, is envisioned as one where Palestine is free from occupation, where refugees can return to their homeland, and where Palestinian people can live as equals with the rights and freedoms afforded to all people.

Al-Aqsa Flood reminded the world that the Palestinian cause is not a conflict to be managed but a struggle for justice that demands resolution. As long as the occupation persists, as long as the siege suffocates Gaza, and as long as Palestinian people are denied their fundamental rights, the resistance will continue.

Conclusion

The Palestinian people have shown the world what steadfastness looks like—sumud in the face of overwhelming odds. They have taught us that justice is not something to be given, but something to be fought for. As we look forward, the call for global solidarity remains more urgent than ever. The world must continue to stand with Palestine, demanding an end to occupation and the recognition of Palestinian rights.

The path to justice is long, but it is a path Palestinian people are committed to walking. One year after Al-Aqsa Flood, the message remains clear: the struggle for freedom, dignity, and justice will not end until Palestine is free. The sacrifices made, the lives lost, and the resilience shown over the past year will be remembered as part of the larger tapestry of Palestinian resistance—one that spans generations and will continue until victory is achieved.

Hassan Nasrallah is the third Secretary-General of Lebanon’s Hezbollah. Born in 1960, he assumed office on February 16, 1992, following the assassination of his predecessor, Abbas al-Musawi, by an Israeli missile strike on his convoy. Nasrallah received religious education in Shia centers and seminaries in Lebanon, Iraq, and Iran. He earned the title “Leader of the Resistance” due to Hezbollah’s role in liberating southern Lebanon from Israeli occupation in 2000, after 22 years, and its subsequent confrontation with the occupation during the July 2006 war. He played a significant role in negotiating prisoner exchanges to return Lebanese and Arab captives, as well as the remains of resistance fighters held by thew Israeli occupation. His fiery speeches and strong personality garnered him widespread popularity in the Arab and Islamic worlds.

Nasrallah’s name resurfaced prominently during the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation launched by Palestinian resistance forces against Israeli settlements around Gaza on October 7, 2023. This was followed by an extended genocidal Israeli assault on Gaza Strip that resulted in tens of thousands of casualties. In response, Nasrallah announced the opening of a “front in southern Lebanon to support the Palestinian resistance,” vowing in several speeches that this front would not cease until the war on Gaza ended.

On Friday, September 27, Israeli occupation Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a series of threats from the United Nations podium, targeting Iran and its allied resistance movements. He specifically singled out Hezbollah, claiming the group had chosen the path of war, leaving the Israeli occupation with no choice but to engage in conflict to secure the return of its people to the north.

Shortly after Netanyahu’s speech, a series of airstrikes were reported in Beirut, targeting Hezbollah’s general command headquarters. This triggered a media frenzy both locally and globally, revolving around the martyrdom of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah. The news sent shockwaves through Lebanon, plunging the country into a state of existential anxiety as the dark cloud of the Israeli occupation’s aggression loomed over the region.

The declaration of a major war against Hezbollah had effectively begun when Netanyahu, from New York, approved the Israeli occupation’s strikes on the southern suburbs of Beirut. Ironically, this announcement was made from the world’s highest platform, the United Nations, which is meant to promote global peace—not to declare war and authorize massacres. This strongly suggests that Netanyahu had received the green light from the United States, and it is possible that secret deals were made behind closed doors in the corridors of the Security Council.

Hezbollah later confirmed the martyrdom of Hassan Nasrallah in the Israeli occupation forces’ attack, with the Israeli army officially announcing his death. The strike also claimed the lives of Ali Karaki, Hezbollah’s southern region commander, and other senior leaders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

According to Israeli Army Radio, F-35 jets carried out the airstrikes using bunker-busting bombs, targeting Hezbollah’s General Staff headquarters, with Nasrallah as the primary target. However, it did not end with these strikes. The Israeli occupation continued its raids, warning residents to evacuate their homes in the southern suburbs. As a result, Beirut’s streets witnessed unprecedented waves of displacement, closely resembling the mass exodus experienced by the Palestinian people in Gaza.

Overview of the Operation

The aggression that led to the assassination of Hezbollah’s Secretary-General, Hassan Nasrallah, was executed by “Unit 119” of the Israeli occupation Air Force, commonly referred to as “Bat.” The aircraft involved in this operation were F-15 jets, which targeted Hezbollah’s main headquarters, located 14 floors underground in the southern suburb of Beirut. On Saturday, the Israeli occupation army officially announced Nasrallah’s death, confirming that he was killed in the raid. Israeli occupation army spokesperson Nadav Shoshani declared on the platform “X” that “Hassan Nasrallah was killed,” while another army spokesperson, David Abraham, confirmed to AFP the “elimination” of Hezbollah’s secretary-general.

Israeli occupation media provided extensive coverage of the assassination, with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant describing it as one of the most important operations in Israel’s history. Channel 13’s military affairs correspondent, Or Heller, reported that Brigadier General Amichai Levin, commander of the Hatzerim Airbase, stated that the primary aim of the operation was to separate Lebanon from the Gaza Strip, especially since Nasrallah had connected the two fronts after October 7th, rendering them indistinguishable.

How did the Zionist entity carry out the assassination?

According to reports from Israeli websites, an operation codenamed “New Order” was conducted while senior Hezbollah officers were stationed at their headquarters, coordinating military operations against Israel. The attack commenced when Israeli Air Force planes dropped 80 MK84 “Heavy Hide” bunker-busting bombs, each weighing a ton. As reported by the “Israeli Broadcasting Authority,” these bombs are capable of penetrating fortifications as deep as 50 to 70 meters underground, targeting Hezbollah’s underground infrastructure.

Israeli intelligence infiltration was exacerbated by its involvement in Syria, where Hezbollah members were forced to communicate more openly and less securely. WhatsApp became a significant weak point as members inadvertently sharing sensitive information. This allowed Israel to collect a vast amount of intelligence, including hacking the phones of both Hezbollah members and their leaders. A key aspect of the operation involved Israel meticulously mapping out Hezbollah-controlled areas, particularly the southern suburbs of Beirut (Dahiya), dividing them into security zones of 400 square meters. In these zones, Israel monitored civilian activities in minute detail, tracking their daily routines, what they ate and drank, when they left or returned home, their clothing choices, who they communicated with, and who visited them. Israel’s surveillance technology was highly sophisticated, employing advanced cameras, drones, and other cutting-edge tools.

This large-scale intelligence project, which spanned 15 years, gathered detailed data on every resident within each apartment, including their visitors and the purpose of their interactions. Israel employed a mix of advanced technologies—such as tracking cameras, voice identification, drones, and internet hacking—alongside human intelligence provided by local and foreign agents. They also analyzed the “needs” of the residents, tracking where they bought food, parked their cars, worked, traveled, and sent their children to school. Israel even identified where individuals purchased electronic devices, received salaries, and conducted financial transactions, down to which barbershops and cafés they frequented.

Having gathered this comprehensive intelligence, Israel infiltrated the supply chains Hezbollah members relied on, equipping technological devices like televisions with surveillance systems capable of listening, tracking, and voice detection. Some devices were even rigged with explosives. Additionally, Israel established each individual’s digital footprint—capturing their voice, appearance, online activity, and apps used. This allowed Israel to plant agents and informants within Hezbollah’s ranks.

For every 400-square-meter security zone, Israel assigned specialized teams from Mossad, Shin Bet, and Unit 8200 to monitor, surveil, and execute targeted operations, including assassinations. Beyond local monitoring, Israel extended its surveillance efforts to ports and airports, hacking daily travel records. Both landline and mobile telecommunications networks were breached, further compromising Hezbollah’s security and communications network.

Israeli media reports have revealed details regarding the assassination of Hezbollah’s Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, in the southern suburbs of Beirut. According to the Israeli newspaper Maariv, a man approached Nasrallah, shook his hand, and smeared a substance that enabled Israel to track him. Within two minutes, Israeli forces successfully located Nasrallah and confirmed his presence at a headquarters in Beirut’s southern suburbs.

Minutes after confirming his location, Israeli aircraft launched airstrikes on the site, dropping an estimated 80 tons of bombs. This attack resulted in the deaths of Nasrallah and several senior Hezbollah leaders. Reports indicated that Nasrallah died from suffocation after seeking refuge in an unventilated room within the headquarters, where toxic gases from the bombing leaked in.

News agencies reported that Nasrallah’s body was retrieved from under the rubble. Two sources confirmed to Reuters that the body was intact, showing no visible injuries or wounds. It is believed that Nasrallah’s martyrdom was caused by suffocation, as he was in an unventilated space and suffered severe pain prior to his passing.

Sources further indicated that gases entered the room due to the bombing, leading to his suffocation. Medical and security sources confirmed that no injuries were found on Nasrallah’s body, suggesting that his death was the result of the force of the explosion. A video circulated on social media captured the moment Nasrallah’s body was recovered from the rubble.

The Condemnation of the Assassination

In Palestine, Hamas Movement condemned Nasrallah’s killing as a “cowardly, terrorist act” by the Israeli occupation. In their statement, they strongly denounced the attack as barbaric, accusing Israel of violating international norms and endangering global peace. They reaffirmed their solidarity with Hezbollah and the Islamic resistance in Lebanon, vowing continued unity against the occupation. Further, Abu Obeida, the spokesperson for the al-Qassam Brigades, expressed mourning for Hassan Nasrallah, referring to him as a martyr. In a tweet, he stated: “We grieve with all patience and fortitude for His Eminence, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, and his brothers,” recalling Nasrallah’s sacrifices for the freedom of Al-Quds and Al-Aqsa. Obeida praised Nasrallah’s steadfast support for the Palestinian resistance and highlighted his dedication to the cause during the “Al-Aqsa Flood.”

The Lebanese government declared a three-day mourning period starting Monday to honor Hezbollah’s Secretary General, Hassan Nasrallah, after he was killed in an Israeli airstrike on Beirut’s southern suburbs. Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the attack as an attempt to destabilize Lebanon. In Iran, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei announced a five-day mourning period, condemning the assassination as part of a U.S.-Zionist conspiracy. Iranian officials vowed a firm response while coordinating with Hezbollah and regional allies. Turkey and Russia also condemned the assassination, with Turkish President Erdoğan calling for an end to Israeli hostilities, and Russia holding Israel responsible for potential regional escalation. In Iraq, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani expressed sorrow and announced three days of mourning, condemning the occupation’s actions as an escalation.

An assessment by the Al-Quds International Institution predicts a resurgence of popular resistance as Israeli occupation efforts intensify to enforce religious hegemony over Al-Aqsa Mosque and attempts to erase the identity of the sacred site. This comes amid ongoing aggression in the West Bank, escalating resistance, the continuing genocide in Gaza, and increased activity on the supporting fronts.

The assessment, prepared by Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque specialist researcher Ziad Abheis, highlights that this year’s Jewish holiday season spans from October 3rd to October 24th, immediately followed by the first Hebrew anniversary of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, set to fall on the morning of Friday, October 25th.

The assessment suggests that this season may witness the fiercest assault on Al-Aqsa yet, with Israeli leadership viewing the anniversary as an opportunity to address the “October 7th crisis.” There is a possibility that the occupation may plan a multi-front attack on Wednesday and Thursday, October 24th and 25th, making it crucial to prepare for this potential escalation and even consider preemptive measures to strengthen resistance.

Al-Aqsa Flood in the Face of Elimination

The assessment indicates that the Al-Aqsa Flood operation marked the sixth phase of Palestinian resistance against the decisive phase launched by the Israeli occupation, with U.S. support, aimed at the comprehensive liquidation of the Palestinian cause. This phase began with former U.S. President Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel on December 6, 2017.

This was followed by a demonization campaign and the defunding of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), aimed at eliminating the right of return. The recognition of all forms of political representation for the Palestinian people was also withdrawn, even those that conformed to “colonial conditions.”

Subsequently, in January 2020, the “Deal of the Century” was announced, attempting to redefine the Palestinian cause as an issue of financial aid in exchange for security. This culminated in official Arab normalization on several fronts, including the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan, in what became known as the “Abraham Accords.”

Revenge Attack

The assessment explains that the occupation responded to the Al-Aqsa Flood with a hasty revenge attack, followed by the development of a “decisive strategy.” This ideological strategy, while defying the balance of power, forms a cohesive whole that explains Israel’s systematic approach to waging war across various fronts.

Torah Holiday Season The assessment clarified that the extremist Temple groups, which are active within the religious Zionism movement and target Al-Aqsa Mosque, have historically used the Torah religious and Zionist national holidays as periods for aggression against Al-Aqsa. Their goal is to transform the mosque’s identity from an exclusively Islamic site into a purely Jewish one, starting with a phase of shared control.

These extremist groups have designated the holiday season, spanning from the Jewish New Year to the “Simchat Torah” holiday, as the worst period of aggression against Al-Aqsa each year. This year, the season will extend from October 3 to October 25.

The assessment highlights that this historical pattern has triggered five uprisings and wars, all beginning at Al-Aqsa during these holidays. These include the 1990 Al-Aqsa massacre, the 1996 Tunnel Uprising, the 2000 Al-Aqsa Intifada, the 2015 Knife Intifada, and most recently, the Al-Aqsa Flood. As the Israeli occupation and its extremist groups push for a decisive resolution, this season of uprisings is likely to be renewed, given the current circumstances on the ground.

Aggression on Al-Aqsa

The assessment predicts that the Israeli occupation police will sponsor the largest assault on Al-Aqsa Mosque during the upcoming Hebrew holiday season, where they will attempt to impose the full public performance of Torah rituals for each holiday and renew the siege on Al-Aqsa. The goal is to initiate and sustain this situation until the next Ramadan, similar to last years’ experience, taking advantage of the lower number of visitors during the winter.

Through this, the occupation police aim to fully dominate the eastern courtyard of Al-Aqsa and will attempt to expand the area for performing Torah rituals to the western side of the mosque, near the western colonnade, creating a new zone for exclusive control. They will also renew the practice of settlers dancing at the gates and exerting auditory dominance over the mosque.

The assessment suggests that reaching the peak of the announced rituals will involve repeated public shofar blowing on Thursday (October 3) and Sunday (October 13). It is expected that the shofar will be blown repeatedly and openly inside Al-Aqsa, at its gates, and around its walls.

Additionally, it is anticipated that the occupation will storm Al-Aqsa wearing “white repentance garments,” which mimic the attire of the priestly class, perform the “Priestly Blessings” prayers publicly, and impose plant offerings or the “Fruits of Sukkot” within the mosque. The aggression is expected to culminate in the performance of the “Simchat Torah” rituals in Al-Aqsa on October 24, symbolizing the culmination of the aggression with ceremonies portraying a victory after one year since the Al-Aqsa Flood.

Areas of Action

In conclusion, the assessment states that Al-Aqsa Mosque is facing the peak of the existential threat it has witnessed since its occupation. “This necessitates engaging in the battle to defend it by all possible means of resistance, at the level of the Palestinian people wherever they are, as well as the surrounding countries and all the peoples of the Arab and Islamic nations.”

The assessment calls for pressure on the official Arab regimes to adopt any positive stance and halt the deterioration of their position.

Additionally, it calls for launching the largest mobilization and awareness campaign in the history of solidarity with Al-Aqsa, starting today and continuing until the end of October 25th.

Source: Online platforms & Al-Jazeera

Malaysia’s support for Palestine dates back to the early years of its independence. As a young nation emerging from the shadows of colonialism, Malaysia identified strongly with the struggles of other oppressed peoples. The Palestinian cause, representing the fight against occupation, displacement, and apartheid, resonated deeply with Malaysia’s own history of fighting for sovereignty. This shared experience of resisting foreign domination fostered a natural alliance between the two nations. In 1936, young Malaysian Burhanuddin Helmi visited the Levant and became a guest in Palestine, where the people were engaged in a struggle against Jewish immigration and British mandate. While Palestinian cities were in revolt against the mandate, Burhanuddin had the chance to participate in the Great Palestinian Revolt (1936–1939). He was arrested by the British for four months and then deported to Malaysia.

Shortly after returning to his country, Burhanuddin decided to fight in his own way. In 1937, he launched the magazine Taman Bahagia and began mobilizing against British colonialism, exposing their plans to establish a national homeland for Jews on Palestinian land, and introducing himself as a “fighter for Palestine.” The British, who were still ruling Malaysia at the time, arrested him again and shut down the magazine.

Politically, Malaysia refused to recognize the Israeli occupation when its state was declared and has since adopted the term “Nakba. ” Tunku Abdul Rahman, the first Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya in 1955 and the first Prime Minister of independent Malaysia (1957–1970), adhered to this stance. He bolstered international efforts in support of the Palestinian cause through the Non-Aligned Movement and his rounds at the United Nations, particularly his position following the burning of Al Aqsa Mosque in 1969. He raised the issue of Jerusalem, called for international and UN protection for the city and its residents, and demanded a global response to the actions of the Israeli occupation.

In this article, we explore some aspects of both governmental and popular Malaysian support and solidarity with the Palestinian cause, especially after the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation.

Support in Multiple Directions

Faraj Hanini, President of the Palestinian Students Association (PSA), states, “Malaysia, with its government and people, always stands with Palestine, whether in justice or oppression.” This support spans from hosting around 4,000–5,000 Palestinians, including students and refugees, to mobilizing governmental, humanitarian, educational, and religious institutions, as well as mosques, to strengthen solidarity with Palestine. It also extends to collaboration with the Palestinian community in every government or popular activity, such as festivals, conferences, or marches.

According to Hanini, this has transformed the presence of Palestinians in Malaysia and their roles in forming academic, social, and humanitarian bonds with the broader Malaysian public.

It has become an opportunity to maintain and enhance both governmental and popular support for Palestine. This is particularly evident in Malaysia’s warm reception of Palestinians, who are invited to participate in religious gatherings, Qur’an memorization sessions, student exchanges with Palestinian universities, and the annual exchange of imams during Ramadan. Additionally, Malaysian medical delegations frequently offer support to hospitals, medical centers, and clinics during every Israeli assault by providing expertise and medical supplies.

Dato’ Seri Professor Kamal Nasiruddin bin Mustafa, President of My CARE, highlights the close relationship between the Malaysian and Palestinian people, stating that the events of October 7 were not a turning point but rather a continuation and strengthening of prior efforts. These efforts include emergency relief programs, education support, food security aid, and the construction of hospitals and schools. My CARE has been consistently providing educational scholarships both in Malaysia and Palestine, as well as supporting Qur’an memorization programs and sponsoring students of the Holy Qur’an.

Moreover, My CARE’s humanitarian and relief partnerships with several Palestinian organizations in Malaysia—such as the Palestinian Cultural Organization Malaysia (PCOM), the International Coalition for Jerusalem and Palestine, and institutions of the Palestinian Liberation Organization—have led to the implementation of various projects in cooperation with these organizations and other relief agencies in affected areas. This collaboration earned My CARE the leadership of the Southeast Asia Humanitarian Committee starting in 2019.

On the Nature of Malaysian Popular Support for Palestinians in Recent Years

Norma Hashim, the founding director of the Hashim Sani Center for Palestinian Studies and treasurer of Viva Palestina Malaysia, points out that Malaysian efforts have become more focused over the past 16 years. These efforts have adopted a methodology aimed at improving the economic and living standards of Palestinians, especially given the Israeli siege on the Gaza Strip and the dwindling economic opportunities. Consequently, the initiatives have been directed towards supporting university students in both Palestine and Malaysia to complete their studies, providing small credit loans for business ventures, and supplying balanced food baskets.

“Survival” Instead of “Economic Recovery”

The Malaysian political and popular movement in support of the Palestinian cause continued following the launch of the Al-Aqsa Flood operation. The Malaysian leadership made a decision to stand with the rights of the Palestinian people, despite Western countries and some Arab states condemning the events of October 7. Malaysia rejected any external pressure, which gave the public a comfortable space to mobilize both inside and outside Malaysia to support Palestinians.

Jasmi Johari, head of the Malaysian Humanitarian Aid and Relief Agency (MAHAR), explained these developments: “One month after the war on Gaza began, the Malaysian government launched the Operation Ihsan initiative. This initiative represented a collaboration between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, NGOs, companies, and individuals to unite their efforts in helping Palestine. Today, more than 100 active entities are involved, securing hundreds of tons of essential and medical supplies from the Malaysian people for the Palestinians in the early stages.”

On the other hand, Norma Hashim believes that the current war on Gaza has radically shifted the priorities of humanitarian organizations, transforming their objectives from “economic recovery” to “survival.” This shift has meant a change in the type and nature of aid, focusing solely on providing meals, securing drinking water, clean clothes, essential food, and medical supplies, as well as establishing temporary clinics to treat the wounded, given the destruction or overcrowding of hospitals.

Despite the importance of this type of aid, Jasmi Johari, Head of Operations for Ihsan, believes that the main obstacle to Malaysian support is not political or economic pressure but rather the geographical distance. This distance makes every aid operation very costly and fraught with the risk of failure, due to food spoilage or the expiration of medical supplies, particularly with the closure of the Rafah crossing. As a result, humanitarian workers have resorted to preparing aid in nearby countries. For example, Ihsan prepared 60,000 food baskets in Cairo and sent them to Gaza.

Wounded of the War on Malaysian Soil

The latest step in Malaysian efforts was the transfer of 41 wounded Palestinians from Egypt to Malaysian hospitals for medical care, accompanied by 86 of their relatives, including 19 children under the age of 12. The ages of the wounded range from eight months to 62 years. In an interview with “Metras,” Abdullah Bashir Abdul Rabbo, one of the injured Palestinians transferred to Malaysia, spoke about his treatment journey. He and his mother were selected based on their ability to endure a 19-hour long flight. Abdullah suffers from the amputation of his right foot, severed tendons in his right forearm, stiffness in his left-hand fingers, and blocked tendons. His mother suffers from heart disease, high blood pressure, and fluid in her lungs. Abdullah was injured when Israeli forces bombed the Halima Al-Sa’diya School in Jabalia, northern Gaza. He is currently preparing for physiotherapy sessions in Malaysian centers, with the aim of receiving prosthetic limbs in the future. Abdullah highlighted the warm reception from the Malaysian authorities, particularly their approval for them to travel using only personal identification cards, along with the medical care and welcoming attitude from various organizations.

“Let Him Go and Become the Prime Minister of Palestine”

Despite widespread agreement among Malaysian society to support the Palestinian people, the government’s decision to receive wounded Palestinians faced various criticisms and incitement campaigns. Some attacked the Prime Minister, saying, “Let him go and become the Prime Minister of Palestine.” The government was accused of neglecting its own people in favor of bringing in Palestinian wounded. Humanitarian organizations were also criticized for allegedly prioritizing medical treatment for Palestinians over Malaysians, and media outlets spread inciting material against Palestinians, portraying their presence in Malaysia as entangling the country in an unnecessary conflict.

In response to this campaign, Wong Chun Wai, Chairman of the Board of the Malaysian National News Agency, argued in an article that “receiving 41 wounded out of 77,000 injured due to genocide makes the criticism illogical.” Malaysia is not the only country providing medical assistance to Palestinians; Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey have also done the same. He added that Malaysia has historically welcomed refugees, including 250,000 Vietnamese refugees, as well as Syrians and Bosnians during their respective crises.

In response to accusations of neglecting local needs, Wong pointed to the allocation of 41.2 billion Malaysian Ringgit (approximately 96.94 billion US dollars) in the 2024 budget, a 13% increase from the previous year. Additionally, Malaysia saw a 4.9% rise in average wages, and the Ringgit recorded the best performance in Asia.

Faraj Hanini, President of the Palestinian Students Association, viewed the criticism as a sign of the failure of external pressures to divert Malaysian policy away from the Palestinian cause. He remarked that playing on the “race and minority” card is a sensitive issue in Malaysian society, which strives to close any gaps in this area and unite to strengthen its regional and international standing. Hanini noted that the occupation and its allies “do not play openly,” so it’s very likely that recent criticisms were driven by external parties. However, he dismissed the idea that these criticisms would impact Malaysian activism in supporting Palestine or dampen its enthusiasm. He did suggest, however, that such criticisms might lead to a “reassessment” of this support, possibly followed by a campaign to highlight the government’s domestic achievements alongside its international efforts, or by expanding public support to better reflect Malaysia’s ethnic diversity.

In conclusion, Malaysia’s political system has historically based its support for Palestine on three key principles: first, Islam, which unites the Malay people with the Palestinians; second, the shared experience of British colonialism, which imposed similar forms of oppression on both Malaya and Palestine; and third, Malaysia’s connection with Arab and Islamic countries after gaining independence, along with its partnership in several international organizations such as the Non Aligned Movement and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

During the “Liberate Palestine” festival, organized in partnership between the government and various organizations to condemn the assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh, Minister Seri Johari recalled his last meeting with Haniyeh in Tehran. At that meeting, Haniyeh asked him about Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and said, “Return to Anwar and tell him to continue his noble struggle.” Following that, Ibrahim pledged that he “will not give up,” swearing with more than 20,000 Malaysians participating in the event that they would continue to support and advocate for Palestine until it achieves freedom and victory.

Source: Sujoud Awais, Metras Website & Agencies

Arab and Islamic countries and organizations welcomed a historic resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday, which calls on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories from 1967 within 12 months. They described the resolution as historic and demanded its tangible implementation.

This came in official statements issued by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Jordan, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, alongside Palestinian approval and Israeli rejection.

The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the UN General Assembly’s adoption of a resolution drafted by the Palestinian Authority, which demands Israel end its “illegal presence in the occupied Palestinian territories” within 12 months. The ministry described the resolution as a pivotal and historic moment for the Palestinian cause and international law. It also thanked the member states that supported, sponsored, and voted for the resolution, which was adopted by a majority of 124 votes, with 43 countries abstaining, and 14 opposing it.

The ministry further clarified that the positive vote of more than two-thirds of UN members represents a global consensus that the occupation must end, its practices and crimes must cease, and it must withdraw its forces, including settlers.

The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) also welcomed the UN General Assembly’s adoption of the resolution calling on Israel to end its illegal presence in the occupied Palestinian territories.

In a statement, Hamas considered this vote an expression of genuine international support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights to self-determination and the establishment of an independent state. It added that this resolution reflects international alignment with the Palestinian struggle for freedom and independence.

Hamas described the decision as an important victory for the Palestinian people and a reaffirmation of Israel’s growing isolation. The movement also expressed appreciation to the countries that voted in favor of the resolution and urged them to take further measures to isolate Israel and pressure it to stop the war.

The Kingdom emphasized the need for practical and credible steps to achieve a just and comprehensive solution to the Palestinian issue.

The UAE also welcomed, in a statement from its UN mission, the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution, affirming that the International Court of Justice’s ruling is clear in stating that the Israeli occupation is illegal and must end. The UAE further urged the Security Council to translate the advisory opinion into tangible steps.

Jordan, in a statement from its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, welcomed the UN resolution, emphasizing that the adoption of the resolution reflects the international community’s will and international law in supporting the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the establishment of an independent, sovereign state on the June 4, 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital. The Jordanian statement stressed the need to compel Israel to implement the resolution, including immediately halting all new settlement activities and evacuating all settlers from Palestinian land.

A Historic Decision

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), in a statement, welcomed the UN General Assembly’s adoption of a historic resolution regarding the illegality of the Israeli occupation. The OIC viewed the resolution as reflecting international consensus on the justice of the Palestinian cause and its steadfast support for the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people. The organization called on all states to assume their responsibilities and take individual and collective actions to ensure Israel’s compliance with its obligations under international law and the relevant international resolutions.

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) also welcomed the UN General Assembly’s adoption of a resolution calling for the end of Israel’s occupation of Palestine. Secretary General Jassim Mohammed Al-Budaiwi emphasized the need to end the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and affirmed the Palestinian people’s right to reclaim their lands. Al-Budaiwi stated that the actions taken by Israeli occupation forces, including settlement expansion and geographic changes, are illegal and illegitimate, with no recognition at either the regional or international level. He stressed the international community’s responsibility to ensure the implementation of the resolution.

Earlier, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas welcomed the UN decision, as reported by the Palestinian News Agency, asserting that the resolution’s support by two-thirds of UN General Assembly members represents international consensus on the justice of the Palestinian cause and a victory for the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination and the establishment of their independent state.

In contrast, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected the resolution, stating that it is detached from reality and harms peace efforts.

Occupation and Expansion

Israel occupied the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem in the 1967 war, and has since been constructing and expanding settlements in the West Bank.

In July 2023, the Israeli government claimed it had “the right to impose its sovereignty” over the West Bank, asserting that “the Jewish people have the exclusive right to self-determination on this land.”

International law prohibits Israel from annexing any part of the West Bank, according to numerous United Nations statements over the years.

The UN vote came as Israel, with full American support, continues a devastating war in Gaza since October 7, 2023, resulting in over 136,000 Palestinian casualties, mostly women and children, and more than 10,000 missing, amidst massive destruction and a deadly famine.

On October 27, the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza with 120 votes in favor. In December, 153 countries voted in favor of demanding an immediate humanitarian ceasefire instead of just calling for it.

In defiance of the international community, Israel continues this war, disregarding the UN Security Council’s call for an immediate halt and the International Court of Justice’s orders to take measures to prevent genocide and improve the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Source: Al Jazeera & Agencies

1. The Concept of Normalization

The root word ” طبع ” (ṭaba’) in Arabic carries many meanings, including normalization and

acclimatization, implying that a person becomes accustomed to something until it becomes second nature, or a matter becomes widely accepted in society until it is considered normal, i.e., familiar and ordinary. The word “ṭaba'” also conveys meanings of corruption and debasement. For example, we say, “the child has been tarnished” to indicate moral or physical corruption. We say, “the metal has rusted” or “the cloth has been soiled.” Similarly, “someone has been corrupted” refers to a person who lacks virtue and noble qualities.

Normalization, derived from the verb ” طَبَّعَ ” (ṭabba’a), means “calling for the normalization of relations with the enemy and making them ordinary.” This is directly relevant to the issue of normalization with the Zionist entity. The term “normalization” is laden with various meanings, interpretations, and analyses, which some view as an unforgivable crime. But what exactly is the precise definition of this  term, particularly in the context of Palestine and dealing with the occupation of its territories?

2. The Meaning of Normalization with the Zionist Entity

Normalization refers to the establishment of partnerships, initiatives, or joint projects, either locally or internationally, in a direct or indirect manner between Palestinians or Arabs and the Israeli entity, whether involving Zionist individuals or Israeli institutions.

Political and economic normalization is the “restructuring of relationships between two countries so that they become normal relations.” However, there is a flaw in the concept and in the attempt to impose and promote it, as political and economic normalization should occur between two natural countries, which is not the case with the Israeli occupation due to its structural abnormality. Israel remains a settler-colonial entity, not a state, and it will never be one, Allah willing.

It is also evident that those engaging in normalization do not address the brutal aggression, killings, torture, and persecution practiced against the Palestinian people. In short, normalization refers to dealing with an abnormal situation (such as the Israeli entity) as if it were natural and accepted.

3. Historical Background of Normalization

Arab governments previously refused to recognize the Israeli entity after the declaration of the establishment of Israel in 1948, in protest of the decision to partition Palestine. This rejection led to a series of Arab-Israeli wars in the following decades.

After the Six-Day War in 1967 and the October War in 1973, Egypt signed a treaty with the Israeli occupation in 1979, becoming the first Arab country to sign a peace agreement with “Israel,” known as the Camp David Accords.

In 1994, Jordan also signed a peace agreement with “Israel,” known as the Wadi Araba Treaty, following Israel’s acceptance of the two-state solution with the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1993. This was aimed at defusing any potential for renewed conflict through regional solutions, such as “Israel” leasing borderlands for 25 years.

4. Normalization with the Zionist Entity Entails Legal Responsibility

Normalization, according to specialized legal studies, is considered a form of criminal complicity in an ongoing crime that has persisted for 75 years: the military occupation of Palestine. These studies are based on international legal rulings and agreements, most notably UN Resolution 194, which concerns the right of return for Palestinians and compensation, emphasizing the civil responsibility of the occupying state. The issue is not limited to the crime of military occupation. A review of Israel’s occupation history reveals a record of crimes, including ethnic cleansing, massacres, terrorizing civilians, displacement, illegal settlement, the Judaization of Al-Quds, settler crimes, and the construction of the separation wall. International condemnation has been issued for each of these crimes, but none have resonated with the Zionist occupier. All these crimes are seen as “normal” under the concept of normalization! Every behavior by the Zionist entity that normalization seeks to normalize is, in fact, a crime under international law.

5. Legal Consequences of Normalization

• Normalization will grant the Zionist entity recognition of its sovereignty over Palestine, removing it from the circle of hostility among the normalizing countries, as if granting the right to continue the occupation, maintain settlements, and commit more crimes. Normalization would reward the Zionist entity for its actions.

• It will obscure the truth that Palestine belongs to its indigenous people and that its seizure contradicts international law, which defines mechanisms for state succession and territorial inheritance. The natural and legal outcome should be the right of the people and the original inhabitants of areas that were part of the Ottoman Caliphate, such as Palestine, to control their lands.

• The occupation is an ongoing crime, accompanied by crimes of aggression, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Thus, normalization is a complicit crime, and signing agreements with this ongoing criminal situation since 1948 — whether in security, military, trade, cultural, political, or tourism sectors — constitutes direct or indirect criminal partnership and encourages impunity.

• Normalization will not halt the Zionist entity’s criminal behavior, nor will it stop the threat of settlement expansion.

• One of the purposes of normalization is to sign agreements with the Zionist entity, which entrenches recognition of the entity. This entrenches the occupation as a permanent condition, contrary to international law, which does not permit occupation to become permanent. Occupation is a temporary condition created by force majeure and has no legal foundation.

• Normalization with Israel supports and legitimizes its dangerous practices and serious violations of international humanitarian law, especially regarding Jerusalem, including the decision to declare it as the “eternal capital” of the entity, which is a clear violation of United Nations resolutions.

6. Normalization in the Time of Genocide

In addition to what was mentioned above, normalization could also be a violation of the Genocide Convention. Article 1 of the convention states that “the contracting parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in times of peace or war, is a crime under international law, and they undertake to prevent and punish it.” Have the countries normalizing with Israel taken any steps to prevent Israel from committing genocide?

As Israel faces a lawsuit at the International Court of Justice for violating the Genocide Convention, and with expected arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court against its prime minister and defense minister for heinous crimes committed in Gaza over the past nine months, violating all international treaties and UN resolutions demanding a ceasefire — including temporary measures from the ICJ ordering Israel to halt military operations in Gaza and allow humanitarian aid — and with several countries severing diplomatic ties in protest of its crimes, discussing the resumption of normalization with this entity is unnatural and unacceptable.

7. Conclusion

Every form of cooperation that serves the interests of the Zionists poses a significant threat to Arab and Islamic nations. The Israeli entity strives relentlessly to establish relationships, agreements, treaties, activities, and projects with various Arab countries to affirm the Arab endorsement of what is now referred to as the so-called “Israeli state” — which, in reality, has no legitimate existence on the true world map.

The spread of normalization will gradually render what is unnatural seem normal and will further strengthen the Zionist entity as long as there are Arabs and Muslims who support it, directly or indirectly. Therefore, they must fully understand the importance of resisting the Israeli offers for normalization, which only benefits this oppressive entity.

The Israeli occupation’s attempts to normalize relations with Palestinians and Arab nations are

desperate efforts that clash with Israel’s abnormal and unnatural structure, evident in its deviant and unorthodox actions.

Source: Dr. Ahmad Al-Idrisi (Member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars) & Luna Farhat (Al- Akhbar) & Al Jazeera & Online Websites

According to the Lebanese Ministry of Health, 11 people were martyred and around 4,000 were injured today, Tuesday, in southern Lebanon and the southern suburbs of Beirut due to explosions targeting Hezbollah members, caused by wireless communication devices (pagers) in an operation likely orchestrated by the Israeli occupation.

1. What are pagers?

A pager is a small wireless communication device developed in the 1960s for emergency use. It relies on sending digital signals via radio waves to notify the user that someone tried to contact them. It can also send short text messages. Before the widespread use of mobile phones, pagers were a popular means of communication, particularly among doctors working night shifts and emergency service personnel. They were also used in military and security fields.

• Why do Hezbollah members use pagers?

The pager is considered relatively old technology that cannot connect to the internet, making it somewhat safe from cyberattacks, espionage, and tracking attempts, which are common with mobile or smart phones. For this reason, it is still used in military and security fields, and this is likely why Hezbollah members possess these devices.

• How did the devices explode?

The New York Times revealed early on Wednesday new information about how Israel booby-trapped the communication devices that exploded, killing and injuring many Hezbollah members in Lebanon and Syria. The newspaper quoted informed officials saying that Israel hid explosives inside a batch of Taiwanese communication devices (pagers) that were imported to Lebanon. The officials stated that Hezbollah had ordered more than 3,000 communication devices from the Taiwanese company “Gold Apollo,” and small explosives were placed next to the battery of each device. They clarified that the communication devices ordered by Hezbollah were tampered with before reaching Lebanon. The newspaper also quoted Israeli officials saying that the devices were distributed to Hezbollah members across Lebanon and some of its allies in Iran and Syria. In the same context, Al-Monitor newspaper reported from intelligence sources that thousands of devices obtained by Hezbollah had been booby-trapped by Israel before being handed over to the group. The sources mentioned that Israel carried out the attack after gathering information indicating that two Hezbollah members had discovered the devices had been compromised, while the original plan was to detonate them in case of an all-out war to gain a strategic advantage.

CNN also reported from sources that the explosion of the pagers in Lebanon was a joint operation between Mossad and the Israeli army.

The Wall Street Journal reported from informed individuals that the damaged communication devices were part of a new shipment recently received by Hezbollah. Additionally, the American newspaper cited the security company “Lobec International” as saying that the explosion was caused by software that overheated the batteries, leading to their explosion, or by a remotely detonated charge.

The Washington Post, quoting a security research center, said that the incident resulted from the largest operation to replace imported communication devices with a batch containing explosives. A Lebanese security source told Al Jazeera that the wireless communication devices that exploded had been pre-rigged with explosives.

The Lebanese security source explained to Al Jazeera that the weight of the charge that was detonated did not exceed 20 grams of explosive materials.

He added that the communication devices that were detonated were imported five months ago, indicating that investigations are underway regarding multiple theories on how the explosive charge was activated.

Sources close to Hezbollah told the Associated Press that the new communication devices were equipped with lithium batteries, and it appears they exploded due to overheating.

Commenting on the incident, Euronews quoted system analyst and former U.S. intelligence agent Edward Snowden, suggesting that explosives were planted in the devices rather than a cyber breach, as the high number of consistent and very severe injuries points to such a cause; otherwise, there would have been more fires.

Meanwhile, Reuters reported that Su Cheng-Kuang, the founder of the Taiwanese company Gold Apollo, said the communication devices that exploded in Lebanon carried the company’s trademark, but production was outsourced.

Su added that the targeted devices were manufactured by a company in Europe that had the right to use the Taiwanese company’s brand.

In light of the recent developments, Reuters reported that Taiwanese police had arrived at the headquarters of Gold Apollo.

• Which areas were most targeted?

The injuries were concentrated in southern Lebanon and the southern suburbs of Beirut. However, there were no specific targeted areas, as the victims were all individuals carrying pager devices, regardless of their location. This is evidenced by the injury of four individuals in Syria as a result of an explosion in their car in a tunnel in the capital, Damascus. Syrian media suggested that the injured were Hezbollah members whose communication devices exploded.

• How many victims so far?

Moments after the series of explosions began, the number of injured rose to more than 4,000 people in Lebanon alone, 400 of whom are in critical condition. All of the injured were Hezbollah members carrying the targeted devices. The Lebanese Minister of Health announced the martyrdom of 11 people, including a child, among the victims. He stated that hospitals in the south have exceeded their capacity, and efforts are being made to transfer the wounded outside the province. The Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, Mojtaba Amani, was also among the injured due to the explosion of a communication device he was carrying, according to Iran’s Mehr News Agency.

Source: Al Jazeera, Agencies & American Press

Earlier on Tuesday, the Government Media Office in Gaza, alongside civil defense authorities, reported that at least 40 people were killed and more than 60 injured in an Israeli missile attack on a tent camp in the al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis, where Palestinians were sheltering. Many remain missing. Israeli occupation forces have frequently targeted areas where their military had previously directed civilians to seek safety.

The Health Ministry noted, “A number of victims are still under the rubble, under the sand, and on the roads, and ambulance and civil defense crews cannot reach them and retrieve them, and they have not reached hospitals yet.” This was reported while the Ministry acknowledged a lower death toll.

The Israeli occupation military contested the original casualty figures and stated that the attack, which witnesses said involved at least four missile strikes, was aimed at a Hamas command center. The Palestinian armed group refuted this claim, calling it a “blatant lie.”

Al-Mawasi has been crowded with displaced Palestinians living in tents since the Israeli occupation army designated the coastal area a “safe zone” during its ground offensives in Khan Younis and nearby Rafah. Rescuers searching for survivors found craters as deep as nine meters (30 feet) at the tent camp, according to Al Jazeera Arabic, citing local sources. Witnesses described chaotic scenes, with fires burning and Israeli reconnaissance planes circling overhead.

One witness, Attaf al-Shaar, told The Associated Press, “The people were buried in the sand. They were retrieved as body parts.” Al Jazeera’s Mansour Shouman added, “Dozens are still missing and the civil defense have been digging with their bare hands to get the people out.”

Despite being designated by Israel as a “safe area” and a “safe humanitarian zone,” al-Mawasi in southwestern Gaza has endured five Israeli massacres since May. These attacks have resulted in the deaths of at least 217 Palestinians and the injury of 635 others.

Al-Mawasi, located along the southern Palestinian coastline of the Mediterranean Sea, has become a refuge for approximately 1.7 million displaced Palestinians fleeing months of Israeli occupation assaults. This pattern of forcing Palestinians to relocate to declared “safe” areas, only to strike them later, has been a recurring tactic since the Israeli genocidal war began in October. However, al-Mawasi remains devoid of basic living necessities and overcrowded with makeshift tents.

Summary of Al-Mawasi Massacres

Mawasi, Khan Younis:

-September 10, 2024:

Israeli occupation airstrikes on refugee tents in al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, killed 40 Palestinians and injured 60 others. Several victims remain missing, buried beneath the sand, according to Gaza’s Government Media Office. Human rights groups and international organizations condemned the attack. Survivors reported that the bombing left deep craters, effectively turning them into mass graves.

-July 16, 2024:

An Israeli drone strike targeted a civilian vehicle on al-Attar Street, killing 17 Palestinians and injuring over 26 others.

-July 13, 2024:

Multiple airstrikes hit refugee camps in the al-Nas area, killing 90 people and injuring 300 more, including many women and children. The Gaza Government Media Office labeled it a “large massacre” and expressed concerns about the capacity of hospitals to handle the large number of casualties. Israel claimed the airstrikes targeted senior Hamas leaders; a claim Hamas denied.

Mawasi, Rafah:

-June 22, 2024:

Israeli occupation artillery shelled refugee tents in al-Mawasi, Rafah, killing 25 Palestinians and setting tents on fire. The Red Cross reported that the shelling affected its office and staff residence, resulting in significant casualties among displaced civilians.

-May 26, 2024:

Israeli occupation warplanes bombed a refugee camp in al-Mawasi, killing 45 Palestinians, including 23 women and elderly people, and injuring 249 others.

Since the beginning of the Israeli genocidal war on October 7, over 41,000 Palestinians, primarily women and children, have been killed, with nearly 95,000 injured, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

Source: Al-Jazeera + Anadolu Agency